This is a guest post by The Weakonomist. His posts provide a excellent perspective on finance and I have enjoyed reading his posts. Please ensure you visit his blog and sign up to his RSS feed.
Over the last 18 months, I’ve watched everyone I care about lose faith in the stock market. It’s pretty much expected in any recession, but this is my first recession as an adult so it’s been painful to watch. This is especially painful because I am responsible for selling them on the power of compounding interest, only to watch the life sucked out of it. But encourage them not to lose faith, because it is in the darkest times that our faith is challenged.[ad#tdg-embedded]
Now that sounds like a religious phrase, and it is. Today I want to show you some parallels between religion and the markets, specifically in the loss of faith. I believe you can’t convince someone to change their mind if they’ve already taken a pessimistic view towards our economy (just ask my dad or my fiancé). It’s just like convincing an Atheist there is a higher power at work in the universe, you can’t do it. What you can do for both of them is open the doors with an argument they would be more inclined to agree with. This is where Financial Pascalism comes in.
That’s a new term, and you heard it here first. But what does it mean? Well around the time Louis XIV was getting settled into the throne (1650s) a French philosopher named Blaise Pascal introduced a religious philosophy that was groundbreaking and controversial. Pascal argued that you might as well believe in a higher power, because there is no downside. Example: In many Christian beliefs an Atheist will go to Hell because they do not accept Jesus as their Savior. If there is no God or hell, then both Christians and Atheists alike will cease to exist or whatever happens. Pascal would tell an Atheist to believe simply because there is no downside to not believing. In essence, you have nothing to lose. This became known as Pascal’s Wager.
I’ve adapted Pascal’s Wager to fit with a financial philosophy. Many of us have been told and live by the creed of saving 15% of our income for retirement. Most of us choose to invest that 15%. We are taught that on average stocks offer a greater long-term return than any other investment. This does require us to bite our nails a bit during recessions though, and some lose faith in the long-term over the fear in the short-term. This is not unlike someone losing their religious beliefs when times get tough. So you lose faith in markets, and put your money into safer investments, or cash. We all know you risk losing the potential upside when markets recover, but you can’t convince those pessimists to stay in based on the old rule-of-thumb.
This is where you introduce Financial Pascalism to the pessimist. Were Pascal alive (and an economist) today, he would tell them there is no downside to keeping your money invested in the stock markets during a downward slide. This is not because the markets will recover, but because of what you would lose if the markets didn’t recover. If everyone invests 15% of their income, and the economy fails, you’re only out that 15%. Sure it’s most of your savings, but everyone else lost their savings too. If you’re no worse off than anyone else, then you philosophically haven’t lost anything.
But what of the people that perhaps made money as the market crashed? They didn’t make money. If our markets crashed and the economy fails, then the money they made is worthless. As a society we would regress to older times in which today’s currency would have no monetary value. So a short hedge fund might have piles of cash, which will come in handy to make fires after World War III breaks out and the world is decimated.
That’s a bit extreme of course, but it drives the point home. The failure of the markets represents the total destruction of the world economy. You might as well continue to trust in the system, because there is nothing you can do to protect yourself if the system flops.
So what do think of Financial Pascalism? Can you sell your pessimistic friends on it? What would Pascal’s critics say of his modern day economic philosophy?
******
If you’re considering putting your money in an online bank you should make yourself aware of the bank deals that are available to you. Many banks offer bonuses for joining their accounts so it’s worth it to do a quick search of the banks you’re interested in to see if there are any ongoing promotions. As the same with credit cards, always make sure to read the fine print even the best credit cards and bank accounts may have some hidden clauses that hidden away in the terms of service.
ObliviousInvestor
Hi Weakonomist.
I love talking about this. People don’t seem to realize exactly what would be going on in their lives in a “stocks don’t make money in the next 40 years” scenario. If such a scenario were really to occur, the stock market would be the least of your worries.
Jason
My favourite response to Pascal’s wager was put forward by the greatest philosopher of our time, Homer Simpson:
“But Marge, what if we picked the wrong religion? Every week, we’re just making God madder and madder!”
In other words, it’s a false dichotomy. You’re guilty of the same thing by framing your argument as an either/or. Either the market collapses, or it does well. That’s a gross simplification and doesn’t take into account a number of possible scenarios nor propose solutions for dealing with them.
Jason
Why was my comment removed? It wasn’t inflammatory.
The Dividend Guy
Hi Jason I am not sure why it was removed – I looked through my spam filter and can not see anything there. Are you able to post your comment again?
The Weakonomist
Jason, this is the kind of feedback I was hoping for. In a blog post you can only say so much. A poorly performing market (as opposed to a failing or flourishing one) nets the same result. The idea is we’re all in the same boat if we all invest in similar ways. When the market is down you’re no worse off than anyone else and when it’s up you’re no better, so Financial Pascalism would tell you to just keep doing what you’re doing. It’s an evolving idea and not something myself necessarily believe in. We’ll see where it takes us. Thank you for quoting Homer too, that was a nice touch.
Jason
Hi, actually it wasn’t removed, it just took awhile to show up. Maybe they need to be approved before they show up? If that’s the case, it should tell me that when I post. 🙂
SJ
Nice post… your iceberg is shrinking.
Do you set out w/ everyone else or just… get left behind?
I like it =)
Manshu
I’d say that God as an all knowing being would know that you were trying to trick him and be madder at you. But, anyway I agree with the idea that stocks are not dead. In fact we may look at this period a few years from now and see a great buying opportunity that a lot of people missed.