A while ago, I created the Rock Solid Ranking, a dynamic stock ranking list that shows a value for each dividend stock I follow. I’ve worked on calculations that consider several metrics in order to find the best companies among all those on the stock market. This list is particularly useful when the stock market is becoming highly valued (not overvalued yet in my opinion).
Each month, I’ll be sharing with you, for free, the top 10 dividend growth stocks for both the US and Canadian markets. You can download your report here:
September 2016 Top 20 Rock Solid Ranking
Previous reports:
August 2016 Top 20 Rock Solid Ranking
July 2016 Top 20 Rock Solid Ranking
June 2016 Top 20 Rock Solid Ranking
May 2016 Top 20 Rock Solid Ranking (I’ve skipped April, sorry!)
March 2016 Top 20 Rock Solid Ranking
February 2016 Top 20 Rock Solid Ranking
January 2016 Top 20 Rock Solid Ranking
November 2015 Top 20 Rock Solid Ranking
October 2015 Top 20 Rock Solid Ranking
September 2015 Top 20 Rock Solid Ranking
August 2015 Top 20 Rock Solid Ranking
July 2015 Top 20 Rock Solid Ranking
Why Update this list on a monthly basis?
The idea of providing you with an updated top 10 list monthly is to show how metrics and rankings can change from month to month. This becomes highly important during the earnings’ season as lots of new data come out at the same time and it’s hard to digest everything. The updated Rock Solid Ranking gives you a quick view in a few minutes of which companies are best or worst. This printer friendly report stands on a single page with lots of metrics to help you quickly analyze if the company deserves more attention for your next pick.
Out of this top 10 for each stock market, I review 2 companies each month; one US and one Canadian.
This month, I will review two companies that have one thing common: They both show graphs with all lines going up besides one…. The payout ratio! It’s hard enough to find strong stocks in such a volatile market, it’s even better when they can increase their dividend payment while dropping their payout ratios!
Kimco Realty (KIM)
Source: Ycharts
This is the first REIT review I do since I run my rock solid ranking. KIM is also the first REIT to show as high on our ranking too! This REIT owns 537 U.S. shopping centers across 36 states and Puerto Rico. With a stronger U.S. economy, you can expect a steady revenue growth in the years to come for KIM. Their biggest presences are in important and flourishing states such as California (16.7%), Florida (10%) and New York (9.7%).
The company has 4,200 tenants and have been in operation for over 50 years. Among their biggest tenants, you have companies like TJX, Home Depot, Alberston’s, Ahold, Ross and Wal Mart. I like the fact that they are not tied to any big tenants. Their largest tenant is TJX with a small exposure of 3.1%. This makes KIM a highly diversified REIT. KIM shows a very good occupancy rate at 96%. All their shopping centers are open air. This usually put KIM in a good situation as they don’t operate mammoth size buildings that could bring their lot of bad surprises. Managing smaller size shopping malls is easier as there are lesser factors to consider.
Management continues to focus on strong cash flow creation and currently benefits from a 1.75 billion dollar line of credit available for further acquisitions. With a payout ratio at 69%, the company is in a very good position to increase their payouts in the upcoming years. The stock currently pays a 3.34% yield and has increased from $0.18 quarterly to $0.26 quarterly over the past 5 years.
Intact Insurance (IFC)
Source: Ycharts
Intact Financial Corporation provides property and casualty insurance in British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia. It distributes insurance under the Intact Insurance brand through a network of brokers and its subsidiary, BrokerLink.
Intact is a leader in P&C insurance in Canada with 17% of the market share. This market is highly fragmented as the top 5 insurers only cover 47% of the market. In other words, After IFC, there are 4 other “big” players sharing 30% of the market and 53% is spread among multiple other insurers. This opens the door to more consolidation and growth opportunity for IFC. The company is also eyeing the possibility to grow outside its market in 2017. The company shows also a strong control of its policies with a constant average of rate of claims around 5% since 2010. Finally, the company risk management culture led to strong cash flow generation covering easily the company’s fixed charged.
The environment looks bright for IFC at the moment. However, such company is always one catastrophe away (flood, major fire or earthquake) to face a serious downfall in their earnings. Managing a fixed income portfolio to cover for their policies is also quite a challenge in a very low interest rate environment.
Overall, I think IFC will continue to pay a very healthy dividend. The stock return has beaten up the S&P TSX by a great deal over the past 5 years showing a stock return of +74.75% vs 17.14% for the index. This is without counting its dividend payments that went from $0.37 quarterly to $0.58 quarterly this year. IFC now pays a 2.45% dividend yield, but show a good growth potential for the future.
How the Rock Solid Ranking is built
I personally use this list to manage my own portfolio along with portfolios I manage at Dividend Stocks Rock. This is not an ordinary ranking where we arbitrarily apply a score to dividend stocks. We actually build a dividend growth model where multiple factors are accounted for in the score calculation. We started by listing the most important metrics we follow before buying a stock. Here’s the list:
1 year Revenue Growth
5 year Revenue Growth
1 year Earnings per Share (Diluted) Growth
5 year Earnings per Share (Diluted) Growth
1 year Dividend Growth
5 year Dividend Growth
Dividend Payout Ratio
P/E ratio PEG
Dividend Yield
Debt to Equity ratio
Price to Book Value
Explanation of metrics used
In order for you to understand why I have decided to use the above mentioned metrics instead of others, I’m providing you with this complete explanation of how I came up with this ranking.
If a company can’t keep up its high ranking, it means its losing pace with one or more important metrics in our model. The more it loses ranking, the closer it is to joining the sell list. On the other hand, a company that improves its scores quarter after quarter definitely earns the buy mention as it shows it’s headed in the right direction. The Rock Solid Ranking goal is to provide you with an instant valuation of a stock according to our dividend growth investing model.
I’m not going to disclose our calculation methods here but I’ll tell you which metrics we follow. This can help you build your own investing model. Total score of a company could technically reach 100% if it was perfect on all attributes. The score can also be negative as we give penalties for negative growth numbers.
#1 SALES
In my opinion, if you don’t sell, you can’t make money. If you can’t make money, you can’t pay dividends. If you can’t increase your sales, you can’t increase your profits and you can’t increase your dividend. This is why revenue growth is so important. The best way to measure if a company is making more money is by looking at its revenue growth.
A company can run through a tough year or show erratic revenue movements. This is why we take a look at both 1 yr and 5 yr revenue growth. The first metrics to be used in our model are:
1 year Revenue Growth
5 year Revenue Growth
More weight is given to the 5 yr and penalties (negative score) are attributed to companies that show negative revenue growth. You can’t hope to increase your dividend consistently if your revenues decrease.
#2 PROFITS
Showing strong revenues is important, but it doesn’t guarantee you will get strong dividend payouts. Profits drive amounts to be paid through dividends. If you look at a company like Amazon (AMZN); revenues are huge but profit is thin. Therefore, they can’t hope to pay a dividend at this point in time (especially when your P/E is 574!).
In order to make sure we don’t give a high score to a company that recently restructured its costs or sold an important asset to boost its profits, we also consider 1yr and 5yr Earnings Per Share (EPS) growth.
1 year Earnings per Share (Diluted) Growth
5 year Earnings per Share (Diluted) Growth
Earnings and revenue growth combined together weigh a lot in our model. Both metrics combined together is the key for a sustainable business model. This is why so much weight (40%) is attributed to these 4 metrics.
#3 DIVIDEND METRICS
Once we have found companies with sales and profits, it’s time to take a look at what we desire most: dividend growth potential! In order to find out if a stock is not only a good stock but a good dividend stock, we use 3+1 different metrics. The “+1” is because we look at both 1yr and 5yr dividend growth percentages:
1 year Dividend Growth
5 year Dividend Growth
Dividend Payout Ratio
Dividend Yield
The 1 year dividend growth shows the company’s willingness (or capacity) to increase its dividend over a short period of time. The 5 year dividend growth confirms this willingness/capacity to keep increasing payments to shareholders.
Then, the dividend payout ratio is also very important to us. We penalize companies paying over 120% of their earnings. We didn’t select 100% as we must always take into consideration that the payout is in $ and profit is an accounting term (including amortization for example). This is why it’s important to give some room for high dividend payout ratio companies. We also give a smaller weight to companies with very low payout ratio (0-20%). This shows that the company would rather keep its money in their bank account instead of sharing the wealth with stockholders.
Finally, the dividend yield is also a debated topic. Some investors are looking at 5%+ dividend yield (I keep receiving tons of email telling me I look for low yield dividend stocks). Many investors (like me!) prefer sound businesses with dividend stocks around 3%. In the past four years, I’ve noticed that stocks paying over 4% often show shakier metrics than stocks with a lower yield. Dividend metrics combined together represent 40% of our ranking calculation.
#4 DEBT LEVEL
Another important consideration is the debt level of a company. The idea behind the choice of this is simple; debt payment requires cash flow, cash flow that could be used to pay dividends. You don’t want a company strangled by their debt and forced to make unfortunate decisions. This is why we use a debt ratio in our model:
Debt to Equity ratio
Here again, a high debt to equity ratio is penalized by negative points.
#5 STOCK VALUATION
Finally, the price you pay for a stock is also important. I’m the first one to pay a relatively high price for a great company. Still, if I can find a company that is relatively similar but traded at a cheaper price than another, I will definitely take a look at it.
We have used the following metrics in our system to give points to each stock:
P/E ratio PEG
Price to Book Value
Leave a Reply